Why Isn't Song on Song?
Alex Song may have the most important role out of the regular starting eleven. Last year, he had an outstanding year, winning tackles, making interceptions, and playing simple passes to Cesc Fabregas or one of the other midfielders to transition Arsenal from defence to attack. This year, a changed role has seen him score a career high in goals, but also lose some of his effectiveness in screening the back four, and has been a major target for criticism as Arsenal have recently conceded more.
Where did it all go wrong for Alex Song, and why?
Arsenal's Midfield
First, let's look at the background to Song's role, which depends so much on how the midfield is set up. Last season, Arsenal played a 4-3-3, with the midfield structured as a '1-2', with Song holding for Fabregas and one other to go forward and join the attack. Because Song had greater defensive responsibility, he didn't push forward as much as he does now, and was, perhaps after Cesc Fabregas Arsenal's most important player (he was the biggest loss for the second leg against Barcelona), and certainly the most improved. Even as Arsenal's midfield switched from a 1-2 to a 2-1, as Arsene Wenger tried to prevent being caught on the counter attack after defeats against Manchester United and Chelsea, Song stayed deep, with Abou Diaby or Aaron Ramsey, playing alongside him, making late runs forward.
This year, the midfield three were kept as a 2-1, with, ideally, a creator (Cesc Fabregas), a destroyer/holder (Alex Song) and a passer (Jack Wilshere or Denilson). However, Wenger usually likes to have a powerful and physical midfielder, such as Abou Diaby, and his continued deployment despite not being one of Arsenal's best midfielders certainly backs up this theory. Not only does a physical midfielder add some needed steel in a somewhat light-weight Arsenal midfield, the powerful running through while dribbling style of Diaby helps break down teams that park the bus. With Diaby out and in order to foil teams sitting back, Wenger has intentionally pushed Song forward, saying
"The teams close us down so much high up because they know we play through the middle," said the manager. "I push my midfielders a bit up at the start to give us more room to build up the game.
"When you come to the ball we are always under pressure, so Song is a bit naturally high up because I want him high up
While this policy has resulted in more goals from Song, it has also lead to a noticeable decline in his defensive contributions, leaving Arsenal's backline exposed.
When Does It Work
Song has had some excellent performances this season; man of the match and matchwinner against West Ham, and he had good games against Bolton and Newcastle (where he completed more passes than Fabregas) as well. The common theme from those two matches is that both teams played a 4-4-2 designed to frustrate Arsenal's midfield by sitting deep, but denying the midfield space. With no direct opponent, Song was given a free role, and he took advantage, especially in the West Ham match, where Fabregas was essentially marked out of the game, Song's free role meant he provided most of the attacking play from the midfield and scored the winning goal.
When It Doesn't Work
However, it hasn't all been good for Song this season, and he's coming off his two worst performances in the Premier League. Against Manchester United, he was poor passing the ball (granted, most of the team was), but more importantly, he only won 1 tackle, and it was an offensive take-on rather than a defensive challenge. Against Fulham, he again gave the ball away in dangerous positions; he won more tackles in this match, but it was still overall a poor performance. Again, there is a common theme here: Fulham, playing a 4-4-1-1, and Manchester United, playing a 4-3-3, had direct opponents for Song, meaning that when he pushed forward, he left a midfielder exposed and also found less space to pass and generally play in.
Can It Work?
One further thing to remark upon is that when Alex Song is partnered with Jack Wilshere, he is partnered with a midfielder who isn't the strongest defensively and likes to get forward. When he is partnered with Denilson, he's partnered with a midfielder who is positionally disciplined, and although he may be slow, he's also a good holding player, who's discipline allows Song to move forward without leaving the back completely exposed. That leaves a couple of conclusions: Song can push forward without leaving the defence exposed if the opponent is playing a deep 4-4-2, or if he Song is partnered with Denilson. If he is partnered with Wilshere or if Arsenal is playing against a 4-3-3 or a variant of a five man midfield, Song's role should be reined in, otherwise his position indiscipline will lead to the defence having to play a high line and will lead to conceding more goals like the goals conceded against Fulham and Tottenham. A shift in Alex Song's role to make him more defensively responsible can see Arsenal's defence become much stronger, which could be the difference between winning the league and not winning the league.
24 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Last year, when Song sat infront of the defense, the majority of ‘poor’ goals against were largely down to goalkeeping errors.
This year, the majority of ‘poor’ goals against (or the major errors) are coming from the defense/midfielders, giving the keepers little chance.
Regardless of who plays with Song, he should be sitting imo. Allow Wilshere to go foward with the ball. Song is needed to do what he does best. Defend.
exactly
I can accept Song going forward if we’re playing a team that’s playing deep and on the counter (West Ham, Newcastle). But for Wenger to allow him to push forward against United is a bit mad.
It’s not exactly Song’s fault, as he’s only doing what he’s told, but maybe there should be part of him that thinks he should defend, or, even better, Wenger should tell him to defend
Squeezed to Song and Bendtner and Song and Nasri oh lovely lovely lovely!
-Peter Drury, the one time his commentating has ever been acceptable.
by Aidan Gibson on Dec 22, 2010 5:16 PM EST up reply actions
Fantastic analysis
I wonder, if Ramsey comes back from Nottingham in form and able to slip seemlessly into the first team, if this makes Denilson surplus to requirements. The tag on his head that’s being rumoured seems quite high and with many clubs apparently after him, we could use that money for more CB cover (Samba or Cahill, for instance).
Song has his place in this team and it’s certainly in a defensive-first role.
"I know you're from Middle America, and sometimes you feel like you're representing more than just a school or a conference, maybe an entire group of American citizens out there."
by Twin Cities Hawk on Dec 22, 2010 6:48 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Thanks
My opinion is that Denilson shouldn’t be sold; yes he could provide money, but if Wenger is to be believed, we should have enough money to buy Cahill or Samba.
My opinion on Denilson is we can’t have enough midfielders. If Song gets injured, or has to play centre back, I don’t really trust Diaby, Wilshere and Ramsey (who will likely be in and out as he is returning from a long layoff) to be able to handle the midfield defensive duties.
Squeezed to Song and Bendtner and Song and Nasri oh lovely lovely lovely!
-Peter Drury, the one time his commentating has ever been acceptable.
by Aidan Gibson on Dec 22, 2010 7:26 PM EST up reply actions
We should have enough money
And Wenger’s reluctance to spend what’s available to him are two very different things.
I do agree that it hamstrings us to sell Denilson, but with Henri Lansbury coming back shortly from Norwich City and someone Wenger highly rates, wouldn’t he be “like a new signing”? His game, from what I’ve read about him, would be able to slot in nicely based on your Song analysis. Being young and relatively inexperienced hasn’t stopped Wenger in the past from playing kids.
"I know you're from Middle America, and sometimes you feel like you're representing more than just a school or a conference, maybe an entire group of American citizens out there."
by Twin Cities Hawk on Dec 22, 2010 9:00 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Lansbury is more like Ramsey, Wilshere or Fabregas
an attacking midfielder who can also play wide right. I think Wenger likened him to Ray Parlour.
Frimpong, back next year, could be a good defensive midfielder. He’s also played with Wilshere since they were both 9, so they’ve got a good understanding with each other.
Squeezed to Song and Bendtner and Song and Nasri oh lovely lovely lovely!
-Peter Drury, the one time his commentating has ever been acceptable.
by Aidan Gibson on Dec 23, 2010 7:00 AM EST up reply actions
Oh, yes, Frimpong is the one I was thinking about
Got their positions mixed up, thanks for the reminder.
I still worry that Wenger won’t spend any money that he didn’t earn that transfer window by selling and with Vermaelen out another month (maybe more), I believe we still need another solid CB. If we can keep Denilson and get a Cahill or a Samba then that’s huge, but I don’t feel that Wenger would do such.
"I know you're from Middle America, and sometimes you feel like you're representing more than just a school or a conference, maybe an entire group of American citizens out there."
by Twin Cities Hawk on Dec 23, 2010 7:55 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Yea, I am tired of Arsenal selling and replacing players. Besides Arshavin, when is the last time Arsenal added to the squad, not merely replaced a player?
Chamakh seemed to me to be replacing Ade
or even Eduardo
by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 23, 2010 12:47 PM EST up reply actions
thanks for the writeup
I imagine it is like you say, Wengers new tactic of rotating the midfield 3 isn’t going to be too effective against good teams. I was worried about this for a long time and I think my worries have proven sadly true.
I think this only solves our defensive issues however. We’re still a terribly one-dimensional attacking team. Neither Clichy nor Sagna can attack wide because Arsh and Nasri are defensive liabilities, and even if they could they aren’t the classiest crossers.
I’m starting to seriously entertain the notion that we’ll need to replace both Clichy and Arshavin if we are going to be stronger against good teams.
SBN Bloglist:
The Short Fuse (Arsenal, EPL)
Sactown Royalty (Kings, NBA)
Being a defensive liability shouldn't matter if you're a forward
It’s the midfield’s job (Song’s especially) to help cover if a fullback wants to go forward to help the attack. It certainly is not Nasri’s or Arshavin’s, defensively inept though they might be.
by Graham MacAree on Dec 22, 2010 8:11 PM EST up reply actions
I mostly agree with this. If Song would actually do his primary job alittle better, Clichy wouldn’t be (as) exposed on an nighly basis.
Nasri is actually a half-decent defender when he wants to be.
Arshavin rarely tries to, but I would still keep him in the squad myself. Really, if Wenger was so concerned with helping out Clichy from the forward, he would be swapping Rosicky to the left and playing Arshavin through the middle, but alas…
Indeed with Fab out I don't know why he didn't make the Rosicky-Arsh swap.
As for forwards not needing to help defend graham…I suppose this is normally the case but our midfield is small enough as it is…if the wingers/forwards don’t help defend then Wenger’s and-one pressing scheme doesn’t work…
And yes I agree Nasri is not terrible. What I meant to say was that he’s ok but not so good that Sagna can feel comfortable to bomb forward as often as I would like to see. And the problem is even more acute on the other side with Arsh and Clichy. Not that Clichy is a good crosser… which brings us to yet another problem.
SBN Bloglist:
The Short Fuse (Arsenal, EPL)
Sactown Royalty (Kings, NBA)
by silverace99 on Dec 23, 2010 12:43 PM EST up reply actions
True Clichy isn't the best crosser and a scorer
but he is still considered one of the best attacking left backs in the world. He is good at the short passes we specialize in and he gets the ball into good positions to open up others. Wings need to be good at crossing but I can forgive our fullbacks for it since they still contribute heavily to our attack in other ways.
Song definitely needs to stick back more.
Attacking players get all the flashy stats and highlights but Song’s job is too important for him to be pushed forward and unable to do it as often as he has been this season. For our offensive scheme to work we need a solid holding player to retrieve the ball and connect on passes between the back 4 and the middle/front 5. Otherwise we leave a huge gap on the counter and it is harder for us to maintain possession.
He seems like he'd be best utilized in a more box to box role to me
Without a true holder, he really is the best thing Arsenal have to fill that role though
by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 23, 2010 12:48 PM EST up reply actions
Is the system designed to have one of the midfield two always holding?
This is something I don’t quite understand about the 4-2-3-1. If Song goes forward, isn’t Wilshere supposed to stay back and shield the back four? And if that is the case, is it a problem of communication? Or is Song simply better at shielding?
Excellent stuff, though.
I think its simply the fact that Song is a good holder and the others...not as much.
You can rotate all you want but the defense isn’t going to be as great with say Wilshere or Fab in front of the back 4…
SBN Bloglist:
The Short Fuse (Arsenal, EPL)
Sactown Royalty (Kings, NBA)
That's an interesting point, Ted
If you look at Wilshere’s comments today, it seems that they may see it as 1 holder and 1 going forward. Most teams that use 4-2-3-1 though, usually use two holders, one who may be a destroyer, and one who is either a holder or deep lying playmaker.
Liverpool in 2008/09 had Mascherano as a destroyer and Xabi as a deep-lying playmaker/holder.
Spain in the World Cup played Busquets as a destroyer and Xabi as a holder/deep playmaker.
Bayern last year had van Bommel as a destroyer (who manages not to get booked) with Schweinsteiger as a defensive midfielder.
The way 4-2-3-1 is structured, there is going to be two deep midfielders. Whether you use two destroyers, two holders or a combination of the two (throw in a deep-lying playmaker), there’s always going to be two deep midfielders, otherwise it becomes 4-3-3.
I think Song and Denilson are the two best holders at Arsenal.
Squeezed to Song and Bendtner and Song and Nasri oh lovely lovely lovely!
-Peter Drury, the one time his commentating has ever been acceptable.
by Aidan Gibson on Dec 23, 2010 10:59 PM EST up reply actions
Ya, I feel that Arsenal should set up like Spain did over the summer myself. Have Song play the Busquets role, play Wilshere in the Xavi role, and Fabregas in the Iniesta role.
Wilshere should be the player who primarily goes forward, and Song just bloody sits like he should. Screw this taking turns stuff. Allow the players strengths to show and put them in positions to suceed, not fail.

by 












