Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: New York Giants Super Bowl XLVI Ring Unveiled

Arsenal end of season review: 2009-2010

(Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

In many ways, writing one article to sum up the entirety of the 2009-10 Arsenal season seems like folly.  Arsenal experienced so many ups and downs, so many extremes of feeling, that this season defies summation in a lot of ways.  thusly, this will not be a traditional end-of-season article, recapping all of the action, but rather, more of an examination in broad terms of where the club found itself, and what might yet come.  This season felt much more frustrating for a good deal of the supporters, too, if one goes merely by the comments on Arsenal blogs.  This has as much to do with expectations and the gap between what seemed possible and what happened than it does with results.

However, in view of what many in the press, in the stands at the Emirates, and in front of their Arsenalized TVs around the world said in July, in the end, this season was another stepping stone towards the highest success that a team can find.

Star-divide

One of the truisms about this Arsenal season is that everyone has ideas about what's wrong with the squad, who needs to go, and who needs to stay.  One can more or less see what the problem is by simply looking at the goals for and the goals against column, and of course it runs deeper than that.  Arsène Wenger knows this as well as anyone and has said so over the past two weeks: Arsenal's defensive record, and thus its defensive corps, must improve, whether by addition or from within.  This is not a secret.  Supporters may disagree about the details and the abilities of individual players, but the overall message remains the same.

The negative aspects of the season are obvious, though.  A slight adjustment of perspective and a shedding of short-termism works wonders to stave off end-of-the-year depression.  It is perhaps hard to recall in the light of the late-season collapse, but last July, more than one prognosticator said that Arsenal would finish outside of the Champions League spots, causing Cesc Fábregas to leave for Spain, causing Wenger to retire, causing a takeover bid, etc.  In light of these expectations, which, granted, many Arsenal supporters did not share, Arsenal's season was positive.

There were no trophies.  Nobody is happy about this, just as nobody is happy that Arsenal failed to dent Man United or Chelsea.  However, saying this does not obviate the fact that Arsenal are better-positioned for success in the next few years than any other English club.  Supporting a team cannot be simply about trophies.  If this was the case, nobody would ever go to Spurs matches, much less QPR or Wycombe matches.  Arsenal have enjoyed a period of success since 1998 that has forever tectonically shifted the expectations for the club.

Everyone wants to win trophies; it is the primary objective for every team.  Arsenal's failure under this criterion this season, though, sits atop a raft of successes that are harder to see.  The team collected three more points than they did last year, which does not look like much, but if the losses to Wigan, Tottenham, and Blackburn had not rolled off in such quick succession at the end of the season, it would have been higher.  It is easy to forget looking at the points total that Arsenal won three more matches this year than they did last year.

Arsenal also scored 15 more goals this year than last year.  And for all of the complaints about defending, only four more goals went against the Gunners this year than did last year, which is annoying, but hardly smacks of unfamiliarity.  It is an issue that Wenger is on top of and concerned about, and one can imagine that allowing, say, even ten fewer goals over the course of 38 games next year could see Arsenal gain a lot of ground.  Considering that the team scored 83 with long-term injuries to van Persie and shorter stints out for Fábregas, Nasri, Arshavin, Bendtner (Arsenal had Arshavin playing center forward, for Pete's sake)...it's easy to imagine Arsenal scoring 100 with fewer man-hours lost next year.

These are crude on-the-field numbers that don't speak to, or perhaps more accurately are the result of, all of the hard work done off the field by persons other than the playing staff.  There are no worries about the price of natural gas and oil at Arsenal.  There are no green-and-gold scarf protests at Arsenal.  There is no Kop full of disgruntled fans worrying about their American owners at the Emirates.  Arsenal are a financially sustainable, well-run organization with a quickly growing international brand.  The club is better-positioned than any other in England to move forward irregardless of the economic situation.  The overall financial goals of the club are starting to bear fruit, as CEO Ivan Gazidis has said that Wenger will have substantial funds to invest in players this offseason if he'd like to do so.  These players will not be leveraged against some kind of unmanageable debt or promise of a deep Champions League run; the funds have been earned on a solid basis by the club.

Another aspect which one cannot emphasize enough is that this team is still young and inexperienced.  The captain is 23 years old; most footballers are just starting to come into their peak years at that age.  Much of the squad is just entering its peak along with him.  If one considers the progress made by Alex Song, Nicklas Bendtner, (both 22), and Theo Walcott (21, and still with much room to improve) this year, Arsenal have a group of players that achieved third place in the most competitive league in the world without playing their best football yet.  The greybeards at Chelsea and Manchester United, while undeniably great now, don't hold out the same potential.

Arsenal supporters know that the team plays the most attractive football in England, frustrating as it can sometimes be.  Their style alone provides immense pleasure week in, week out, and brings results that all but a handful of teams in Europe would envy.  Arsenal have succeeded this year in marketing not only a team, but a feeling, something more out of the realm of the aesthetic than the pragmatic.

When the team finally wins a trophy, it will be all the more satisfying for being borne of the kind of geometrically silky play that Arsenal engenders.  Arsenal furthered their progress in England, solidified their financial footing, and added a year of experience to a very young team.  Mixed in with the disappointment of the past month and a half were moments of sheer running around the house screaming in joy, moments of courage (PKs on broken legs?  okay), and moments to melt faces (Nasri's goal against Porto, Cesc's goal against Spurs, Arshavin's goal against Liverpool).  Although the lights have been put out for the 09-10 campaign, they will light again in August.  The future's bright...

Comment 13 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

At the beginning of this season I figured Arsenal would do what Liverpool did this year

I had them pegged for 6th or 7th place. I have never been more happy to be wrong. I’m very concerned about the state of the defense, but I’m delirious that this team actually finished third. Especially considering all the injuries, I didn’t figure there was any way they would be serious title contenders, but there they were, in March, staring the title in the face. They blinked, this time, but this team exceeded my expectations by so much that I can’t even be disappointed about that.

by pdb on May 12, 2010 5:46 PM EDT reply actions  

To me, it was the same Arsenal team as past years

Little D in big games
Little consistency overall
Injuries killing the team

What Arsenal needs is a true D leader

by Alious on May 12, 2010 8:19 PM EDT reply actions  

Against teams that finished in the top 7 this season Arsenal gave up 18 goals, which isn't the real problem.

If Arsenal keeps the game open and flowing, goals are going to be conceded. 1.5 per game is likely slightly high, but against the best teams in the league teams are bound to concede. Scoring only 14 in those same fixtures is the real problem. Having RVP for most of those fixtures would have helped, but a team that plays the style Arsenal does needs to be better at scoring in big matches than they were this year. I think Arsenals inability to create the garbage goals that other teams get all the time is as much at fault for their coming up short as anything else.

Reyes, Thole, Wright, Beltran, Bay, Davis, Martinez, Tejada...

by Stephen Schmidt on May 13, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that there's too much focus on "big matches"

If Arsenal beat the Wigans and Stokes of the world as regularly as they should, they could afford to only score 14 goals against the other Big Clubs. The league is won and lost in matches against Stoke, Blackburn, and Fulham as much as against Chelsea, Man Utd and Man City.

by pdb on May 13, 2010 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

We did win those games though

only at the end of the season, when we had all these injuries, did we lose against Wigan and Blackburn

"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"

by firejerrynow on May 13, 2010 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Arsenal got 14 of a possible 36 points versus the teams that qualfed for Europe.

They accumulated 61 of a possible 78 versus all of the other teams in the premier league. Winning the games they should win is important, but even taking 71 of 78 points against the lower clubs would have left them short of the title. They need to perform against the top clubs if they want to win the league.

Reyes, Thole, Wright, Beltran, Bay, Davis, Martinez, Tejada...

by Stephen Schmidt on May 13, 2010 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Which is strange

Because last year, it was the other way around. Also, I thought this year, even though we only got three more points, it felt like we were doing a lot better, because we didn’t have all of these boring and/or frustrating draws that we had last year, at least after December or so. Is that how it felt to others?

by Ted Harwood on May 13, 2010 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

For me, teams like this years Arsenal are much more frustarting to watch.

Last year it felt like Arsenal had the opportunity to win anytime they set foot on the pitch, whereas this year it felt like the team was certainly more mature (which showed against the lesser teams), but just short enough on top flight talent that the club was never a threat to beat either Chelsea or ManU even if they got 30 tries at it. I’d rather be disappointed by a few bad outings than feel like my team just wasn’t good enough.

Reyes, Thole, Wright, Beltran, Bay, Davis, Martinez, Tejada...

by Stephen Schmidt on May 13, 2010 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the difference is that

last year’s draws all came in a row, or at least all bunched together; this year all the frustration was spaced out over the course of the season, at least it seemed that way to me.

by pdb on May 13, 2010 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Coming into the season my expectations were mixed

I really did not think we’d miss Adebayor, his last season with us was a lot of standing around, complaining, talking about wanting to be paid more, and speculation of moving to other teams. Offensively I thought we would be fine, even with Nasri missing the first part of the season. And that turned out to be true, especially before RVP was victimized by the injury bug.

I was more concerned about the defense. Kolo was gone(one of my favorite players) and I knew very little about this Vermaelen fellow who was the only incoming transfer. Plus Djourou’s knee was blown out before we played a match, up until then he was supposed to compete for a starting spot. So we entered the season with only 2 dependable solid centerbacks. Song, I was still unsure about despite good flashes the previous year.

Quite frankly I thought we’d finish 4th again.

So a few young players stepped up, Cesc stepped up even more, and we ground out results when we didn’t have our best team out there. Injuries, obviously, were the downfall of the team. Our depth was seriously tested from the very beginning and I’m pleasantly surprised we were able to do as well as we did, with 3rd choice players getting a lot more playing time than most of us would have expected. I think Wenger made the difference. Holding the parts of his team that were still working together and pushing them to succeed. Wenger may get a lot of complaints by fans about the lack of trophies but to stay in the title race as long as we did was damn near a miracle. It would have made one hell of a story had we done it but I’m very content with the season as a whole.

Can’t wait for next season.

by Scrupio on May 13, 2010 12:04 AM EDT reply actions  

Damn I need a life remote control

Why should i wait the next 4 months to see Chamahk in action? Bring on the next season NOW!

(Well besides watching the world cup that is)

by silverace99 on May 13, 2010 2:54 AM EDT reply actions  

Is it a suprise?

Can I just say that Chelsea and Man U were better sides than Arsenal? As far as top 11 the Gunners could stand with anyone (with the exception of the Spaniard) but when injuries happened, and they will, they had no plan B. Man to man they can run with any side in the EPL, but when Van P, Fab, and Arsh went down, there was no replacement. ManU and Chelsea both had the depth to still beat the mid levels when they were at their worst. Gunners just didn’t have it. Economy and silverware just are not compatible, and if they want to not spend the money they need to accept 3rd is fine. CL next year and a run at the title would be great. Get a tender who doesn’t make the easy ones look hard and the hard ones look easy, it is a title run.

by CheezHeadGunner on May 13, 2010 8:02 PM EDT reply actions  

Nice review, Ted

I’m probably going to spew my thoughts on the State of Arsenal in a fanpost soon, as I don’t have a blog but do have stuff to say, but in a short form, I think ultimately this was an unbelievably weird season across the league. Chelsea deserved to be champions, but I don’t think its a stretch to say they’re probably the weakest EPL winner since at least Man Utd in 2003, and possibly going back to Blackburn. That makes it hard to really evaluate where Arsenal are right now. Is this a trend – this season its fairly easy to argue the top 8 were less separated on the pitch than any season in a decade – or a one season anomaly? If its a trend, we have as good a chance as any next year if we get a few key areas shored up. If its an anomaly and Chelski and Man Utd go out and buy top end talent to shore up their aging squads while Arsenal spend thriftily, I suspect we’re looking at 3rd/4th yet again.

The summer will tell us a lot – not only the normal transfer nonsense, but also because its a World Cup year and the potential for big time injuries can change the landscape of the league.

My twitter.

Things fall apart, its scientific.

by pjtopor on May 15, 2010 1:46 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Arsenal Football Club.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Smell-the-glove_small
Not Strictly Soccer Related: A Gaping Hole Full Of Nothing But Happiness
Small
Why do we hate Spurs?
Small
Debt, Relatively Speaking
187206_small
A Way Too Early Look Into Next Season
187206_small
IKTS Final Report
Smell-the-glove_small
Not Strictly Soccer Related: Come Out, Lurkers!
187206_small
IKTS Final Week Fixtures
Small
Where are The Short Fuse readers from? *POLL*
187206_small
IKTS Week 29 Report
Smell-the-glove_small
Not Strictly Soccer Related:  TeeVee

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Did not see it

Shortfuse-xl_small Ted Harwood

Editors

Smell-the-glove_small pdb

Benwyatt1_small Thomas Wachtel

Bullseye-logo_small Aidan Gibson