Silverware vs the Beautiful Game
via soccertrophies.files.wordpress.com
We all love Arsenal for their beautiful game. We love the passing, we love the movement. We revel in the sheer joy of a swift Arsenal counter-attack that leads to a glorious goal. Ok, Ok, so the counter attack goals have all been against us since the Theo Walcott run in the Champions League, 2008. The fact is, where all of Britain slags off the Arsenal and how they can only play beautiful and have no Plan B, or are just a bunch of sissies, we applaud it, and support it through thick and thin.
Now imagine that it's the Champions league group stage. And Arsenal seems to be sitting back more. Felipe Melo has been bought, and Arsenal sit deep with Melo and Song protecting the back four with their lives. They still have more possession than their opponents, but they pass along the back four most the game, and it seems, well... dull. But they win, and progress.
There are few supporters bemoaning Wenger for the 'boring' and 'dull' approach in the CL. They claim this Arsenal side lacks invention, and abandoning his theory of beautiful football, the football we have grown to love. But the rest of us point to new-found defensive solidarity. "Look at the clean sheets! and we still have over 50% possession!" They can turn the beauty on when other sides decide to play against us, just wait and see!"
So the playoff legs come, and the Round of 16 is more of the same, with a comfortable win against a lesser opponent. In comes the Quarter-finals, and the powerhouse Internationale come to town. Fans are reveling in the prospects of this potential classic matchup, but those other supporters predict a boring, cagey and defensive game. The game begins and Inter look a shoe-in to win the tie with some very suspect defending at the back, and a wonder save keeping the game close. No not Almunia. Only a 2nd half coming back wins the tie, all thanks to a freak own-goal. Most post-game chatter by Wenger on how the team is playing well, despite not playing the typical Arsenal way, which is pass-pass-pass it into the net. Supporters are elated that such a strong team has been beat, but still fear their beautiful game is a thing of the past.
A semi-finals versus surprising Athletico Madrid comes next, and the fans can taste the finals. A screamer of a goal seems to have the tie in hand, but Diego Forlan has other Ideas. It's another cagey match in which Arsenal capitalize on a couple headers from the unlikely sources of Nasri and Walcott, but a late goal in injury time conceded give the fans a nervy ending the the game.
The finals is versus Barcelona. On paper it's a mouth-water game. Two club notorious for their beautiful passing game, for the speed at which they can attack, and from a history of great players playing for their club. Every begs for a classic game that these two sides could ideally produced. The Arsenal blogs however are fret with how we will play the Catalans. Will we try to out pass them? Seems highly unlike since the Gunners haven't done this the whole Champions League. Sit back and hit on the counter? Or press high anddeny space? The worry of beautiful football is in the background - but with the thought of Silverware of this magnitude, one we have never won - those worries are left there.
The much hyped final arrives, and Barcelona start on the front foot, pressuring Arsenal in their own half, carving out chances. After near-goals, Wenger decides that sitting back is madness and attempt to press Barca all over the pitch. However, Arsenal players seem to struggle with the pace and movement of the Catalans, and Melo should've seen red. Cards are flying everywhere, mostly to the Gunners, but the score remains tied. The 2nd half comes and and Arsenal should've scored, but somehow contrive not to. Extra time is needed. The commentators are slagging the Arsenal players for their late challenges, and 'thuggery,' condemning them for the exactly same tackles that they applaud and defend by clubs like Stoke and Birmingham. The irony comes when a dive decides to bring Arsenal to 10 men, and Barcelona manage a goal shortly after to win the Champions league, and the Arsenal players and fans alike in tears.
In the aftermath, the media is full of Barcelona praise, and full of criticism of Arsenal's brash and hard tackles. They question what happened to the beautiful game Arsenal used to play, and how it got to intentional fouling to keep up to Barcelona.
The Arsenal fans meanwhile, they ask amongst themselves this. Was reaching the finals and being one unlucky break away from winning the title worth sacrificing THEIR style of game? Their style of game, in which they were beat with? Do Gunner fans sit and stand proud at how their club fought to the death, and almost accomplished the ultimate goal? Or do we sit with heavy hearts at being sooo close and losing both the title game, and their image in the world of football?
Now all you do me a favor and replace the Arsenal in this story with the Dutch.
This is the strife of a Dutch Arsenal fan.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If Arsenal win a trophy I don't really give two shits about what style of play they use to do it
The object of a tournament is to win it, not to be aesthetically pleasing and get knocked out early.
Point taken
But what about sacrificing ‘your game’ and play ugly like Botlon, Blackburn etc… and still come up short?
I am not a slave to aesthetics
I believe that the way to win is to try to win. Whether that means Route 1 football, “parking the bus”, or whatever, I’m fine with that. Adapt to your situation, and if you don’t win, at least you weren’t dogmatic about playing a certain way – you at least tried to do what would get you the win.
While I'd love to win silverware
I don’t want to sacrifice the game we play. I don’t want to win the Champions League playing like Inter, I want to win it playing like Barca.
"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"
Why does it matter though?
Arsenal won cups in the 1980’s and early 90’s playing like Inter, and today nobody complains about that style of play, they just remember the shiny tin pots. Remember, too, this is not a team that historically has played stylish soccer – “1-0 To The Arsenal” isn’t a chant celebrating a stylish goal. Arsenal used to grind teams to dust with the Adams//Keown/Bould/Winterbourn line after getting that lone goal, and that style brought them great success. If that’s what it takes to achieve that same success now, so be it.
You talk about grinding results in the 80s and 90s
but in 1989 when we won the league, we scored the most goals in the league.
It was later the 1-0 came, and then it was bloody awful, I remember a Nick Hornby quote from the mid nineties saying “we either lost 1-0, won 1-0 or drew. Either way it was awful, and either way we didn’t deserve to win anything”
"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"
by firejerrynow on Jul 16, 2010 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions
who says it has to be either style or toughness?
We should be aiming for both. Invincibles anyone?
















