Arsenal's goalkeeping and defending situations still unclear
Arsenal is two weeks into preseason training, and the goalkeeping situation is as unresolved as it was a little over a month ago, when I wrote this. Links to Fulham's Mark Schwarzer still ebb and flow (mostly flow) from the English press. The manager suggests that of the four keepers the club has taken to Austria, none is currently considered the club's number 1, a comment many have taken to mean that he is actively trying to buy still, but one that may also mean that he is waiting to see how things shake out during training. There are also growing rumbles that Sol Campbell will remain at Arsenal, which, while he will not start, cannot hurt at all.
Arsenal bloggers are understandably upset about the prospect of starting the season with Almunia, Schwarzer, or Fabianski as the number one. But emotion surely cannot rule the argument, either; anger, justified as it is, at goalkeeping howlers last year is no basis upon which to evaluate the club's options, is it?
Indeed, there are some statistics that indicate that Arsenal's keepers were well below average, save percentage being one of them, as twitter user Orbinho notes. However, others (OleGunner, ArsenalColumn) were quick to point out the complexities that that particular stat papers over (and again, I cannot help but clamor for an even 25% decent football statistics website--there simply isn't one, although FIFA's work during the world cup was a giant leap in the right direction). Setting all that to one side, it is clear that Arsenal's keepers are not the best in the world, it is clear that part of this has to do with the organization of the defensive players, it is clear that that organization has partly to do with the quality and organizational abilities of the keeper, and it is clear that Arsenal's midfield pressing decreased during the course of the season. It is less clear, but definitely possible, that the defense was disorganized and shoddy at times precisely because of a lack of confidence in their keeper, but that, of course, is much harder to evaluate.
But this is old news. Simply put, I am not entirely convinced, as some are, that buying a "top-class" goalkeeper instantly transforms Arsenal into a title-winner, because I am not convinced that there is a way to measure one goalkeeper against another on level terms. This is not baseball.
It is easier, in a way, to list equally unquantifiable things that will potentially improve Arsenal's defensive record this season: greater squad morale/harmony; a reduction in injuries; an increase in overall team pressing and defensive play; renewed confidence on the part of our defensive core; another year of experience under the belt for players such as Song, Sagna, Vermaelen, and Clichy; players such as Djourou, Koscielny, Gibbs, Eastmond, and perhaps even Frimpong being eager to prove themselves.
Granted, these things are unknowable, but until someone can point to a robust, nuanced, multi-factorial system of quantifiably evaluating goalkeepers in the context of their teams, we all have to rely on "knowing it when we see it". Which is fair enough, but maybe not a solid foundation to make a case for a Schwarzer, Given, or Lloris...
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Well said.
Pardon the tangent, but I think the lack of a good statistics website is more indicitave of a lack of good statistics, especially metrics that are agreed upon as “the important ones”.
The reasons for this are pretty clear, eevn to someone as new to the sport as me. Scoring is rare compared with other sports, fewer lines (compared to say, American football) by which to measure, boundless movement by all players, the fluidity of the usual run of play, etc.
Surely technology and the sabermetrics industry (there is such a thing?) will make more stats available to us, but even in the statistic overload of Major League Baseball, there is still a lot of argument over which metrics are “the important ones”.
In short, I think a good statistics website is probably a long way off.
"Seriously, baby, I can prescribe anything I want!" -Nicholas Rivera, MD, HUMC graduate
Agreed
Soccer simply doesn’t have a flow that lends itself well to statistical analysis (i.e. discrete packets of action that are easily quantified). That being said, the work that was done by FIFA during the world cup seems to be the way forward, and the work done by Gabe over at Behind the Net shows that this data can be put to good use. The average position charts are very handy, if not “numbers”, and the kind of analysis reaped from those by Zonal Marking, amongst others, is great.
And yet, goalkeeping remains on of the hardest things to pin down…
by Ted Harwood on Jul 23, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions
I think the quick development of Szczesny has made for a tough choice for Wenger
Szczesny had a pretty spectacular loan spell with Brentford last year. Granted it was only League One but he made a number of very impressive saves and Brentford fans credit him with helping them stave off relegation. Still he’s only 20 years old which is so very young for a goalkeeper in the Premier League, let alone a keeper for a top 4 club. While Wenger doesn’t want to start Szczesny now, he sees him as the number 1 in the nearish future. So blocking him with a new high profile goalkeeper doesn’t seem to fit into what Wenger is looking for. I’m guessing he just wants a placeholder for a season or two until Szczesny is more experienced, which is where Mark Schwarzer comes in. Who doesn’t excite me a great deal, but he’s better than Almunia or Fabianski.
Here’s a story the BBC did on Szczesny last season.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOY63kPwFYo
Iker Casillas has been Real's first choice since he was 19
I’m not saying Szczesny (HOLY JEBUS THAT’S HARD TO TYPE) is as good as Casillas, but the fact that he’s only 20 shouldn’t keep Wenger from seeing what he can do at this point.
Casillas is more of a special case though, the great majority of big teams have experienced goalkeepers
I think I’d loan Szczesny out to a Premier League side, if at all possible, to see how he does against higher skilled opponents. If that’s not possible, loan him to a Championship side which is still a step up from last season. I’d much rather see him get playing time than sit on our bench though.
And yes he needs a nickname fast. Pretty much anything else would be easier to type.
I would play him
Szczesny (damn Polish) He has one more year to learn until I can see he will be good enough in the premiere. He seems like he needs to work on his consistency as a player. He would be a number two this year but next year I would want him to start. I would almost see if we can put him on loan to a better team then brentford though.

by 










