Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Super Bowl Recipes: A Guide To The Perfect Game Day Menu

Liverpool 1 - 1 Arsenal: a foggy draw

(Photo by Clive Brunskill/Getty Images)

Arsenal scraped a 1-1 draw today at Anfield after a 90th minute Pepe Reina own goal canceled out a 46th minute David N'Gog strike.

Over the long haul of the Premier League season, where a number of draws and losses are inevitable, getting a draw at Anfield is not a bad result at all.  Most Gooners would not deny that, but there are a number of questions in most supporters' minds that still hang over the club, and today's match did little to provide answers either way.

Star-divide

Arsenal dominated possession in the first half but with very little spark on the end of their attacks.  Thomas Vermaelen lasered a free kick on goal that Reina palmed away for Arsenal's only real shot of note.  On the other end, Almunia made an athletic save against Glen Johnson, and Gael Clichy cleared a header from a corner kick off of the line.

At the end of the first half, Joe Cole lunged in on Laurent Koscielny (who was excellent overall today), scissoring down the Frenchman.  Referee Martin Atkinson did not hesitate to show the England midfielder a straight red card, and Koscielny went off on a stretcher.  Arsène Wenger admitted after the game that initially the physio thought Koscielny had broken his leg, and Arsenal fans began envisioning Song or Sagna in at center half.

However, Koscielny shrugged off the blow, and emerged at the start of the second half, ready to go.  Liverpool, down to ten men, pressed from the kickoff, and after one minute of play, an Arsenal error led to the opener.  Jack Wilshere missed an interception, and the ball came to Javier Mascherano who shrugged off the challenge of Abou Diaby to play through David N'Gog on goal.  The Frenchman rifled a shot towards the top corner from an angle that Manuel Almunia perhaps will regret not cutting off, the ball hit the roof of the net, and the Kop exploded with joy.

The goal gave Liverpool's ten men renewed energy while at the same time they seemed content to sit back and break up Arsenal's possession in midfield while looking to get the ball forward to David N'Gog or Fernando Torres.  The half ticked away with Arsenal finding very little penetration.  No shots were forthcoming until Tomas Rosicky stole in to Liverpool's area with about a quarter hour to go, only to see his effort go over the crossbar from 15 yards.

Arsenal introducted Robin van Persie, but continued to find it tough sledding in the final third until the 87th minute, when an invigoratied Arsenal created a mad scramble.  After a cross, the ball sat tantalizingly three yards from the line until Liverpool managed to clear it away.  Three minutes later, Arsenal's renewed pressure would pay off.

Marouane Chamakh, whose aerial game had foundered against the rocks of Jamie Carragher and Daniel Agger for ninety minutes, finally managed to creep in and get in front of Reina on a cross.  He bundled the ball off the post, where Reina, perhaps surprised, managed only to fumble it into his own net.

Arsenal supporters everywhere breathed a huge sigh of relief, but there were four minutes of stoppage time to be played.  Both sides probed carefully for a winner, and in the 93rd minute, Laurent Koscielny, booked already for a challenge earlier, handled the ball in midfield, and saw a second yellow.  It was a harsh sending off for the Frenchman on his debut, and he will miss the next match.  Wenger will surely be taking a long, hard look at the transfer market in the six days before the Blackpool match now.  Atkinson called time on a 1-1 draw, in the end, probably a fair result.

Here is today's match chalkboard, asking why Arshavin stayed on and an effective Diaby was subbed off (one answer, which Wenger gave in his post-mach presser: "Arshavin is the kind of player who can always create something special"):

 by Guardian Chalkboards

Comment 28 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Well i wouldn't read too much into it

No Cesc, and van persie late on.

I AM worried about losing Koscielny though. Blackpool just went and bonked Wigan hard, having a hole in our central defense will hurt.

by silverace99 on Aug 15, 2010 3:37 PM EDT reply actions  

That one wasn't much fun to watch.

I guess it could have been worse, though. Add me to the list of those unimpressed by Arshavin’s performance. The new signings, on the other hand, I liked. Thought Koscielny’s sending-off was a little bogus, and that aside from that black mark he had a good first game. Chamakh was fairly good as well, and I think that once they both adjust to the league somewhat they’ll improve. We need Cesc and RVP back at full strength as soon as possible, though – the offense was unacceptably sloppy with passing and timid in terms of attacking the net, and I think it was in large part due to their absence.

by Thomas Wachtel on Aug 15, 2010 3:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Is Diaby going to make a go of 2010?

Wenger has been singing his praises for so long, it’s hard to imagine he could actually provide what was suggested years ago. If so, joining with Fabregas, Rosicky (who should start seeing more time from Arshavin) and Nasri could give us a disgustingly able midfield.

You don't seem to want to accept the fact you're dealing with an expert in guerrilla warfare, with a man who's the best, with guns, with knives, with his bare hands. A man who's been trained to ignore pain, ignore weather, to live off the land, to eat things that would make a billy goat puke. In *St. Louis* his job was to dispose of enemy personnel. To kill! Period! Win by attrition. Well, *Steven Jackson* was the best.

by 3k on Aug 15, 2010 4:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Well when healthy Cesc and Song take up 2/3 of the midfield

No one else in the team can do what each of them does for the team. So the remaining spot goes to Nasri/Diaby/Rosicky/Wilshere/Denilson/Ramsey/Eboue. A couple of those guys are capable of playing in the front 3 and Eboue in defense but spots are scarce. Diaby does give us a bigger physical presence in the midfield that the others don’t.

by Scrupio on Aug 15, 2010 11:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

It looks like it,

Johan is coming off the injury list and looks like hes going to be the starter against blackpool. Fingers cross he doesnt get injured.

by PSUkegreen on Aug 17, 2010 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think if Liverpool didn't score at the 46th minute

which was an utter cock up by Wilshere, I think we would’ve broken them down

"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"

by firejerrynow on Aug 15, 2010 6:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Well the first match of the season, away to a top 4 rival

I can understand a bit of sloppiness, especially with our best players not at full fitness. Arshavin needs to find a way to get into the match, Johnson kept him pretty quiet all day. Almunia was pretty mediocre, made a couple saves but did not look comfortable. Hopefully, someone else (not Fabianski) will man the goal against Blackpool next weekend.

by Scrupio on Aug 16, 2010 12:17 AM EDT reply actions  

Ted, What’s the deal with posting chalkboards to compare to players like that? It is a completely unfair way to attempt to compare. Everyone and his dog knows Arshavin doesn’t defend, and neither is he really expected to in all honesy. Thus why Wilshere played so deep, and on the left, to cover for him. And as for Diaby, of course he is going to complete a high rate of passes. 90% of the were sideways, and thats ok because that is his job as a DM.
Why not show some chalkboards of something useful. Like tha amoutn of tackles and interceptings that Diaby had cause you know, that was his job. Or Arshavin’s distrubution, or rather, lack there of today.

by DarrenV on Aug 16, 2010 12:33 AM EDT reply actions  

Thinking the same thing.

Also note that for all of Diaby’s passing, none were into the penalty box (not even attempted it seems). Granted it’s not his role, but not even one in 90 mins when Cesc is unavailable?

At least he wasn’t passing it to the opponents like he usually does. (or at least does whenever I watch him on TV).

This.

by elfboy_ on Aug 16, 2010 7:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think its fair to Diaby

Cesc might have been out, but Nasri more than made up for that in the central role.

by silverace99 on Aug 16, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, I am being harsh :)

On a side note, Diaby does have a knack for goalscoring. He makes intelligent runs into the box (or has in the past), has a very decent shot, and is quite a strong guy (isn’t knocked off the ball often).

I still think he can’t pass, but maybe that’s just one more reason to convert him into an out-and-out center forward.

This.

by elfboy_ on Aug 16, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

We'll have to keep an eye on his passing this year

In the past, I think Diaby struggled a lot more with his decision making and his passing, but in yesterday’s match, and a lot of last season, he was quite good with his passing. While there weren’t a lot of ambitious passes, those he was asked to make, he did. Mabye being made to play more conservatively will prove beneficial for him.

by Ted Harwood on Aug 16, 2010 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's a fair point, Darren

You’re right that Arshavin’s role isn’t to defend, but he didn’t do a lot of his actual job yesterday, either, as you point out. Diaby did his job well.

It wasn’t meant as a comparison of the players themselves. I think a lot of Arsenal fans were wondering why Arshavin, who was having a bad day and consistently losing the ball (which the chalkboard shows) and not making much of an impact on the game, remained on the field, while Diaby, who did everything expected of the passer role, came off. The chalkboard wasn’t meant as a comparison of those two players per se, but rather just put separate information about the two in one convenient place.

by Ted Harwood on Aug 16, 2010 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Arshavin can create something out of nothing

Whereas, Diaby will do what he does best. Hold on too long and nothing of substance happens.

by DarrenV on Aug 16, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

True enough

and I suspect that’s why he stayed on. I do think Arshavin looked a bit exhausted yesterday, though.

by Ted Harwood on Aug 16, 2010 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

This is going to be a problem for a lot of top teams this season

I have neither the time or the brainpower to do such an analysis, but I’d be willing to bet that post-WC seasons will almost always show a dropoff in fitness levels and correspondingly in productivity. When you think about it, by May 2011 players with significant involvement in the WC will have been playing pretty much nonstop since August of 2009 – almost two solid years, with only about a month’s break. That has to take a toll of some sort.

by pdb on Aug 16, 2010 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

What's worrying about that

is that Arshavin didn’t go to the World Cup. There are hints flying around that he is still carrying injuries. I like him a lot as a player, he has the ablilty to change a game at a moment’s notice, but there are days when he just looks invisible. It’s the tough call that all sports managers have to make: do you leave a guy on in a creative/scoring role when he’s struggling, knowing that he’s a game changer? Even Michael Jordan had his 2 for 17 days…

by Ted Harwood on Aug 16, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

But Jordan also found a way to influence the game on the defensive end

not something one could level at Arshavin.

That being said, when you’re down a goal, time running out, most of us would want a manager who’ll take the gamble and throw (and keep) on all the offensive players he had at his disposal.

This.

by elfboy_ on Aug 16, 2010 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

If we are 10-15 games into the season

And we are still having these issues with Arshavin, without any production, then I will be changing my view and asking him to be subbed off. Till then, I prefer to give the benefit of the doubt to such a highly skilled individaul

by DarrenV on Aug 16, 2010 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have a tactics question for you guys

I watched the replay of the game last night and thought it really strange that Walcott was playing centrally rather than out wide as he usually does.

I thought about it for a while and decided that it had something to do with Liverpool packing in the defense after going down to 10 men. Maybe since they were tight up in the middle, crosses from the wing would just end up getting intercepted by a Liverpool defender due to superior numbers inside? So then Walcott gets placed centrally to try using his speed to break through the defense rather than go around it from outside?

Your thoughts please.

by silverace99 on Aug 16, 2010 3:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Arsenal attempted a lot of crosses

and had very little success, and I think you’re right: Wenger tried to get Walcott to use his pace centrally to get behind Liverpool’s line. However, as Zonal Marking points out:

http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/08/15/liverpool-arsenal-reina-error/

…they were defending very deep, rendering Walcott’s pace less useful. Nevertheless, a lot of Arsenal’s threat came centrally in the last half hour (Rosicky, Nasri)…

by Ted Harwood on Aug 16, 2010 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rosicky + Wilshire

Rosicky Played beautifully when he came on, a constant threat and had Reina not got a hand on it, would have been a thing of beauty.

Wilshire seemed to struggle in the Cesc role as the game progressed in my opinion. He never really gave himself enough space to open up without Stevie G right on his back, careless giveaway for their goal….but then again, he is 18.

MMA > The UFC

by Renny on Aug 16, 2010 5:11 PM EDT reply actions  

forgot to click reply but its down there

MMA > The UFC

by Renny on Aug 16, 2010 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nasri was being Nasri, finding the ball, taking on defenders and terrorizing defenders (which he was doing extremely well). Wilshire was the man in charge of finding the ball from Arsenal defenders, picking out the strikers and trying to make the final pass from what I saw.

MMA > The UFC

by Renny on Aug 16, 2010 5:42 PM EDT reply actions  

If Nasri was terrorizing defenders very well...

How did Arsenal manage to create very little inthe way of chances? And why were the majority of Nasri’s passes backwards or sideways? I think he had an OK game, but that’s it. Nasri was Nasri in that he passed well sideways, couldn’t beat a defender one on one, and left me expecting more of him.

by DarrenV on Aug 16, 2010 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Arsenal Football Club.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Img-20111211-00015_small
Arsene Wenger's Early Success
Henry_small
IKTS Week 18.5 Fixtures
Images_small
Transfer deadline day mayhem thread
Henry_small
IKTS Week 17 Report/ Week 18 Fixtures
Small
Mind Games
Baby_drinking_becks_small
Foolishness and faith
Small
African Cup of Nations Open Thread
Henry_small
Late Night IKTS Report, and Next Week's Fixtures
Img-20111211-00015_small
Wenger's MLS Mistake
Henry_small
IKTS Week 16 Fixtures

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Did not see it

Shortfuse-xl_small Ted Harwood

Editors

Smell-the-glove_small pdb

Arshavin_you_mad_small Thomas Wachtel

Arsenal_huddle_small Aidan Gibson