Arsenal 1 - 1 Fulham: match report
0 - 1 Thomas Vermaelen OG 61'
1 - 1 Thomas Vermaelen 82'
An Arsenal side that looked plain flat and tired drew a well-organized Fulham side today 1-1 at the Emirates, after Thomas Vermaelen made up for his own goal with a header from a Theo Walcott cross at the other end.
[I had a nice match report all ready to go for everyone, but my computer has just died. So...that won't be seen today, sadly. Instead you get this, from my work laptop].
Follow me below the jump for some hard-hitting analysis.
Arsenal were crap. There's no other way to really put it. Aaron Ramsey's passing was all over the place. For most of the first half, nobody was moving; Andrei Arshavin looks like an ancient Lich out there, even if his passing and invention are still quality. All due credit to Fulham, too; their back four, featuring former Arsenal man Philippe Senderos, was strong all game, heading away danger and generally sandwiching Robin van Persie out of play. The only bright spot for the Gunners was Theo Walcott, who was giving John Arne Riise all he could handle up the right for the Gunners.
The second half was no better, and when John Arne Riise ran onto a ball over the top, Vermaelen was unlucky to slide tackle and poke it past Wojciech Szczesny and in. Things were looking bad until Wenger brought on Abou Diaby and Gervinho, shifting to something more like a 4-2-4everyoneattack as Per Mertesacker came off, Alex Song sliding back to cover for him. Marouane Chamakh came on as well for Arshavin, and suddenly Arsenal looked urgent.
It paid off 82 minutes in, as Walcott was able to float a fine cross to the far post where Vermaelen arrived to head it past Mark Schwarzer, who had been excellent all match long. Between him and Chris Baird clearing a van Persie effort off the line, Arsenal were perhaps unlucky not to have more goals, but they were crap enough that nobody should be aggrieved.
1-1, club in crisis (??).
Some rotation might be nice.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I only saw the second half but this team looks tired right now
Glad they got the point but this could have been ugly.
They put in a lot on Wednesday
And we didn’t rotate that much.
AAARRRRRRRSSSSSHHHHHHHHAAAAAAVVVVVIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNN!
Dream goal!
by Aidan Gibson on Nov 26, 2011 4:39 PM EST up reply actions
honestly,
this doesn’t bode well for ManCity. If these guys need rest, then we must give it to them and risk losing. We’ve got 7 matches in Dec including a big league opportunity at City. The 4 CL spots are going to be dogfights this year.
Captain, there are doubt''s...
v man
Is so good he scores on everything including his own team.
by Mr.BombDonkey on Nov 26, 2011 6:56 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions
Def not a beautiful game
Most everyone looked like they need a good week off. No way any major starters are going against City. Is Park still injured?
Eh, we may have lucked out on this one
Pretty much the exact same squad out there for Dortmund and West Brom with the exception of Djourou for Koscielny and Arshavin for Gervinho. I think it would be a massive surprise to all of us if Wenger started the regulars for City this coming midweek, with exception to our center backs. Other than that, I was only able to watch the first half, and I saw a lot of chances created, RVP could have scored a couple times, Ramsey nearly chipped one in , and Walcott is looking really dangerous.
UMD Bulldogs: 2011 NCAA Hockey Nat'l Champions; 2009 & 2011 NCAA DII Football Nat'l Champions
"Terry's down, oh my! Van Persie all by himself now, around Cech, and that'll do it!"
How about a little credit to Fulham?
I understand that Arsenal didn’t play up their capability but maybe Fulham had something to do with it?
I always give credit to the other team, and Arsenal certainly created more scoring chances in the match. However, I think Fulham hung in there.
I think the result was the right one. Be curious your thoughts on this.
Best of luck the rest of the season.
There was much more in my full report that got lost when my computer died
I only had the one sentence in this abbreviated report, which I wrote when I was in an extremely bad mood because of my computer. Fulham were very good, indeed.
by Ted Harwood on Nov 27, 2011 11:18 AM EST up reply actions
Thanks
Listen, for Fulham to come to the Emirates and bring out a very offensive lineup showed me that Jol wanted to go for all 3 points which I think they tried to do. That is all I can ask for.
In regards to Arsenal, they were all over us late in the game and showed their class. Fulham were hanging on in the end but I think it was the right result.
by Russ Goldman on Nov 27, 2011 11:25 AM EST up reply actions
Could anyone tell if there should have been a handball against Dempsey late in the second half?
I forget who took the shot but it seemed that Dempsey kind of flopped and knocked it down with his arm but it happened so fast and they never showed a replay. The ref just waved play on.
It would have been nice to sneak the win, but is was an ugly game. Ramsey noticeably looked gassed and gave up on a lot of plays. Glad Diaby is back for depth, but he still seems to just put his head down when he receives the ball and dribbles into trouble way to often. The team seems to loose a lot of fluidity with him involved.
by jimmylauderdale on Nov 27, 2011 10:30 AM EST reply actions
You'd have to see how the rulebook classifies the armpit
Is it part of the arm or part of the chest?
Captain, there are doubt''s...

by 














