In Which I Discuss What's Wrong With Wenger's Approach Without Calling For His Head
Arsene Wenger, if you believe the popular press, is "embattled", has "lost the dressing room", and has "lost the plot". The big question is, how did he get here? How did he go from revolutionizing the game to being a man who has supposedly lost the plot in such a short period of time? Many of the things you'll read in this piece are nothing new, they're familiar criticisms - I just wanted to assemble them all in one place and attempt to...well, I'm not sure what. I can't solve his problems, I can't know what's going on in training, I just want to better understand what I think I know. So, here is a list of what I see as Arsene Wenger's major issues at this point.
1. Tactical Rigidity. As we all know, Arsene Wenger is not a man to tinker. He has a way he likes to play, and he plays that way come hell or high water. When he has a team that can play in his preferred way, Arsene's method is unstoppable - it flows, it destroys, it makes people ooh and aah in appreciation and it's a joy to watch. Problem is, when he doesn't have the horses, he can't run his race - yet he still tries to, with obvious (and painful) results.
2. Resistance to evolution. Arsene Wenger revolutionized the English league when he first arrived. He seemed to be the only one to understand that fried food and copious amounts of beer are not a good post-training regimen, and that players shouldn't smoke; he introduced nutritionists at Arsenal and improved (and personalized) training regimens, and it created a super-fit team who ran past everyone for several years.
Now, however, the rest of the league has caught up to Arsene and his methods, so that advantage is gone; every top team is ultra-fit now, and every top team has sophisticated training methods and fitness regimes. This is where Arsene Wenger should be trying to find and exploit the next undervalued asset, to get all Moneyball, but he doesn't seem to be doing so.
3. Persistent bunker mentality. I understand that every manager has to have his players' backs, but I am getting somewhat tired of hearing Arsene, after a loss in which it was clear Arsenal were completely outplayed, say "this was a really good performance" and proceed to rationalize why they lost. At some point, the hand has to go up and say "This wasn't good enough" - he did that after Milan, and as painful as it was, it was refreshing to hear because he never normally does that. There are only so many rationalizations that a fan base can hear before they start not listening, and I was getting close until Milan.
4. Lack of rotation. This ties in with #1 a bit, but it's still frustrating - Arsene pays lip service to squad rotation, and has gone out and built a big squad, but the only time he ever seems to want to rotate is when he has absolutely no choice, through injury or suspension to his preferred starting lineup. I fully understand that soccer is a game of communication and understanding, and don't want Wenger to rotate just for the sake of it, but it does get frustrating to see the same team thrown out there for every single game when that team clearly isn't getting the job done.
5. The Contract Problem. I don't know how much of this is down to Arsene, but it is well known that there are millions of pounds' worth of mediocre players at Arsenal right now. I'm not referring to the starting lineup, but the reserves - there are players that never see a game for Arsenal who make £3-4 million a year, which is nice work if you can get it but it makes those players virtually unmoveable. A lot of those players could do a job at a lower Premiership team or a Championship team, but very few of those teams can afford the wage bill, so Arsenal are stuck with them for now. Again, I'm not sure how much of that is down to Arsene, but it is my (admittedly limited) understanding that he has a pretty big say in who to bring in and how much they make, so he has to have some share of the responsibility for this.
The common thread through all these issues, though, is that they are not fatal and are completely fixable. Nothing on the list I just drew up screams "WENGER OUT".
What I would love to see, rather than Wenger's head on a pike outside the gates of the Emirates (hey, it's England, they might still do that!), is another David Dein figure at the club - someone who can challenge Arsene's worldview, and push him to think a little differently. It's no secret Dein filled that role admirably in his time at the club, and while I wouldn't draw a direct correlation between Dein's departure and Arsenal's current state, it is telling that Dein left in 2007 and Arsenal haven't really progressed since.
The rest of this season and this summer will arguably be Wenger's most crucial stretch as Arsenal manager - if he proceeds as he always has, and doesn't change a few things, he might find it rough going next season. But if he can evolve and change himself the way he evolved and changed Arsenal, he could be the envy of the Premier League all over again. I know which one I would rather see.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'll give you this, this is the first season without Fabregas.
I suppose that if I were someone with authority, I would be willing to give Wenger another season to prove that he can adapt to the modern game (let’s face it, his success was a decade ago….). If he continues to display a lack of flexibility though, I do think it’s time to look for another manager.
Of course, I have no authority.
SBN Bloglist:
The Short Fuse (Arsenal, EPL)
Sactown Royalty (Kings, NBA)
The Tactical Rigidity is what gets to me the most
Even when we had Fabregas and Nasri, our opponent’s strategy was essentially to sit back, wait for Arsenal to make a mistake in possession (which they inevitably would do) and then destroy us on the counter.
In the 2009 CL semis, Man U absolutely crushed us with that strategy. 2012 and Arsenal are still getting beat in the same way by Milan and Sunderland.
by LouisMurphy'sLaw on Feb 21, 2012 1:01 PM EST reply actions
It really can't be stated enough
How much David Dein meant to Arsenal.
"I know you're from Middle America, and sometimes you feel like you're representing more than just a school or a conference, maybe an entire group of American citizens out there."
by Twin Cities Hawk on Feb 21, 2012 1:09 PM EST reply actions
Surely efficient managers (in the business sense) are out there.
It’s not like Cesc, who was a once-in-a-generation player (for the Arsenal academy).
Managing Editor, OnceAMetro.com
by Ben Schneider on Feb 21, 2012 3:16 PM EST up reply actions
Dein's role was not just as a good business manager, though
He existed as a counterweight to Wenger, and was about the only person at Arsenal whose opinion Wenger listened to. And most importantly, he did not always agree with Wenger – all of which broadened Arsene’s mind a bit and pushed him more than he is currently being pushed.
I don’t know the inner workings of the Arsenal board/coaching staff, but from the outside, it seems that now there is no one at Arsenal who will pull Arsene aside and say “hey man, what about this?” and be taken seriously.
But if they looked around, they must be able to find someone who will do that job.
Okay, it may take some time to bed this new person in, but there’s far too much going on in football clubs these days to centralize power in one person (the manager).
Managing Editor, OnceAMetro.com
by Ben Schneider on Feb 21, 2012 3:23 PM EST up reply actions
Problem is, who is that person
I mean, you can’t just go and ask for resume’s for a position for challenging a coach to do his absolute best. This feels like it would have to be guess and check, you can’t just get a qualified person for the job, he needs just the right personality to really have an influence.
They could bring someone off the street in right now
the problem is getting Arsene to trust that person the way he trusted Dein. That’s not something you can look for – they can replace Dein’s business role no problem. Dein had that extra advantage of a really good rapport with Arsene, though, and that’s…I won’t say irreplaceable, but it’ll be harder to find than it would be to just find a good business person.
Arsene trusted Dein because they had a relationship.
Whomever they get in will have to do the same. But ignoring it and dumping all of the footballing issues on Wenger is not a solution.
Managing Editor, OnceAMetro.com
by Ben Schneider on Feb 21, 2012 3:38 PM EST up reply actions
I'm not saying it is
I think Wenger wanted control of a lot of the footballing issues, though, so I’m not sure “dumping” is the right way to put it. At this point it seems like the board needs to tell him “Dude, we’re bringing in this person who will take a lot of the footballing issues off your back so you can focus on the team” and hopefully that person will also grow into a Dein-type sounding board; but even if s/he doesn’t, having a person like that on board can’t help but help.
Even if he wanted/wants all the power, he shouldn't have it.
One person can’t do everything — nor should they!
Managing Editor, OnceAMetro.com
by Ben Schneider on Feb 21, 2012 3:45 PM EST up reply actions
Arsene trusted, and still trusts, Dein because they had a friendship in addition to a working relationship
But I do agree with you, that Wenger needs someone above him to assist and monitor decisions made within the club. But it’s not as easy as bringing someone in. Dein’s resume speaks for itself on how good he was at his job(s).
"I know you're from Middle America, and sometimes you feel like you're representing more than just a school or a conference, maybe an entire group of American citizens out there."
by Twin Cities Hawk on Feb 21, 2012 4:52 PM EST up reply actions
How can we rotate if we have barely enough quality for a first XI?
This team will be the death of me.
Subject line, please
and you have a good point. But at this point Wenger would have very little to lose if he were to introduce some underused blood into the squad.
Look at the oft-mentioned Park
He was brought in to play, and yet he’s not playing. If he’s a good player, rotate him in or loan him out. If he’s not a good player, sell him on somewhere that he might be valued. That’s an example of the kind of rigidity that frustrates me about Wenger.
That's why I didn't go with 'nothing to lose'
I’m conflicted over whether I care about missing the Champions League next year – at this point my attitude is “I don’t care but maybe I should”, but I think I mostly don’t. How’s that for a firm stance?
3. IMO the fact that he does not criticize his players publicly is a good thing.
However, I hope he does that in private or in the locker room because criticism for bad performance is necessary.
Having said that, I feel like he does not properly punishes bad performance (bad performance IMO) with lesser playing time/starting job.
Yeah, I wouldn't want him to rip his players in the media either
but the constant denials that the team isn’t playing well, on even a general level, get a bit old. “We didn’t have our best game today” would be nice to hear when they don’t, for instance – that doesn’t implicate any individual player but it does acknowledge that things need to be fixed.
And you’re right, he doesn’t really penalize bad performances; I hadn’t thought of that but it’s a valid point.
You mean they don't have to run laps or 'suicides' at the end of practice?!?
Soft indeed.
Captain, there are doubt''s...
I disagree, at some point there needs to be accountability.
It makes him look silly, blinkered, and weak at times.
Managing Editor, OnceAMetro.com
by Ben Schneider on Feb 21, 2012 3:17 PM EST up reply actions
I believe ripping individual players in the media is counterproductive
I have no problem with him ripping them at training or after the game in the locker room, which he may well do. But I would love to see him come out and say “my team played like crap today” or some such thing much more often than he does. Not that I want them to play like crap often, but you get the point.
Okay, perhaps not individuals, but maybe saying 'the defence' or something would work.
I also get the feeling that he rarely gives the players the ‘hairdryer treatment’. Obviously that doesn’t work all the time, and it should be used very sparingly, but at least sometimes he may need to change his approach in the dressing room. Being nice and calm all the time…..doesn’t always work.
Managing Editor, OnceAMetro.com
by Ben Schneider on Feb 21, 2012 3:25 PM EST up reply actions
That's why I said I was so happy to see him go off after the Milan game
and I would love to see something like this occasionally.
LOLLYGAGGERS!
On the rotation point: rotation is not an end in itself. It's a way to keep players (somewhat) fresh.
And, if used appropriately (i.e. not switching out the whole team all the time, but one or two players each game) can be very effective. Ferguson is one of the best in this area, as we know.
Managing Editor, OnceAMetro.com
As am I on Football Manager, it should be mentioned.
/dangano’d
Managing Editor, OnceAMetro.com
by Ben Schneider on Feb 21, 2012 3:20 PM EST up reply actions
You're absolutely right
and Wenger seems to be one of the worst, at least in my anecdotal knee-jerk analysis. I should go look into this.
Not to be all trolly but,
Cheer up Arsenal, you could be CSKA Chelski.
Tottenham Hotspurs, Penn State, and Winthrop are the only things that made me cry in my adult life.
by Tottenham Makes Me Cry on Feb 21, 2012 5:02 PM EST reply actions
I take solace in this lol!
I don't even know what to put in here knowing Steve can just change it anytime he wants (the jerk) :cP also something about trolling CFC and WAGNH
by Sabrina Dessipe on Feb 21, 2012 6:55 PM EST up reply actions

by 














